w

Monday 1 September 2014

DSS/APC bribe face-off: Who blinks first?

Precisely on August 14, 2014, the blunt and fearless Media Director of the Department of State Services (DSS), Marilyn Ogar shocked Nigerians with the stunning revelation that politicians of a particular “political party” offered N14million to two top officials of the secret intelligence service to sway the just concluded Osun gubernatorial election in favour the party.
The DSS spokesperson told puzzled media representatives, during a weekly press briefing held at the National Security Information Centre, Abuja, that a director of the DSS, an operative on election duty in Osun was offered N4million and N10million for another superior officer to enable them sway the electorate or turn the results in favour of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
When Ogar made the accusation, she deliberately refused to call the concerned party by name but her constant allusions to the desperation of officials of the opposition party and the unfolding altercation between the secret service and the APC left nobody in doubt about which party was responsible for the alleged infringement.
Before the latest dispute, Ogar had engaged politicians in verbal attacks over their desperation and eagerness to drag security agencies, especially the DSS, into politics warning that doing so would not augur well for the country.
The tempo of the misunderstanding between the opposition APC and the DSS has since deepened with public opinion shifting against the DSS for employing double standards in its methods and dealings with politicians and political parties.
Since Marilyn Ogar threw the bribe “bomb” into the charged political atmosphere, Nigerians have derided the motive of the disclosure, which was intended to bring applause to the service. Many commentators have said that as positive as the disclosure may have been it has inadvertently backfired because of the way it was handled and the matter has instead placed the DSS and its officials on the negative spotlight.
Some observers of the unfolding drama have even claimed that the alleged bribe was either cooked up by the DSS officials to spit the opposition or that even if it was true, the money was rejected because the operatives feared a likely backlash should the deal leak knowing that trading with politicians can sometimes become a bad, dangerous business.
Marilyn Ogar literarily celebrated the fact that the All Progressives Congress (APC) incumbent Governor Rauf Aregbesola was declared winner of the election reasoning that since the alleged bribe was calculated as an inducement to influence security men to change or alter the outcome of the election, when the APC feared that it would lose the polls, the DSS would have been blamed if PDP had won.
“We thank God that APC won the election in Osun State. There was no bomb blast because there were enough security personnel on ground. The security forces that assisted in the election in Edo State were the same ones that went to Ondo, Anambra and Ekiti,” Marilyn said.
Explaining that the director who was approached by the politician, was an officer in charge of coordinating election duties in Osun, the DSS spokesperson  said only promises of N4 million and N10 million each were made but that no money actually exchanged hands or were brought to the scene of the meeting with officials of the agency.
She however remarked that, “It is because the money was declined, that is why the political party is presently having a running battle with the DSS. Thank God the APC won the election. Its loss would have been blamed on the DSS,” the officer said and thereafter, many members of the APC have been questioned by the DSS on events related to the election especially the bribe scandal.
The security officer, in justifying the crackdown, condemned the alleged attempt by politicians to bribe DSS officials describing the action as, “a waste of time and an effort in futility.” She stressed that DSS operatives were properly trained, well paid professionals who would not compromise values and the ethics of their profession by collecting bribes.
“We are well paid. I will say it categorically that our operations are well funded. The N14 million that was offered cannot be compared to the N200 million that was spent by the DSS. Which one will you go for, if you were an operative? People should stop using money to entice security agencies. The Federal Government and the people of Nigeria who engaged us have the capability to take care of us.
“I want to tell you that there is a big man occupying a very sensitive position in Osun State. The man should thank his God that it is not the DSS that arrested him with the huge sums of money he was found with,” Ogar remarked even though she could not explain whether the big man was the person who offered the DSS operatives the bribe.
Ogar was however forceful when she said: “I am emphatically repeating my call that politicians should leave the agency and other security organs out of politics,” explaining further that DSS officers on election security duties and related operations are usually paid their allowances and other sundry entitlements in advance to insulate or prevent them from every form of gratifications.
The All Progressives Congress (APC) refused to be intimidated and promptly launched an attack on Marilyn Ogar as well as the Department of State Service over the bribe allegations especially when the DSS quizzed some of its officials for questioning and demanded the resignation or reassignment of the media director.
National Publicity Secretary of the party, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, who had some personal axe to grind with the agency, described the allegation as baseless even as he challenged Ogar and the agency to back the accusations with “evidence, knowledge and facts.”
The party also promptly went to court to seek injunction restraining the DSS from further arrests or harassment of its officials in a desperate attempt to clear its name.
APC did not mince words in describing the accusation that the party proposed to give DSS officers N14 million bribe as “lies and cheap blackmail by a conspiratorial organisation,” querying why the person who made the offer was not arrested by the DSS.
Continuing, the APC said: “Apparently, Ogar has never heard of a ‘sting operation’ that is widely used by security agencies to catch a person who is committing a crime. The allegation by Ogar would have been sweet in her mouth had the DSS mounted a sting operation to catch whoever was offering the alleged bribe, and then prosecute him or her.’’
The party also advised Ogar and the entire DSS to hide their guns, facial coverings and their preferences when next they are posted to provide security during elections in any part of the country, adding that elections are not war but a celebration of democracy.
APC said: “It is sad that a spokesperson of the DSS does not know that there is no offence called ‘loitering’ under the Nigerian laws. For Ogar to claim on national television that the APC National Publicity Secretary and other officials were arrested for ‘loitering’ in Oshogbo on the eve of the governorship election is the height of ignorance and constitutes a great embarrassment to the DSS.
“It is even worse that the so-called spokesperson made a joke out of such a faux pas by an agency that is supposed to be non-partisan. How can a spokesperson of a sensitive government agency not understand that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria provides for freedom of movement?
“On what basis did Ogar question what the APC National Publicity Secretary or any of its officials doing in Osun, when the same fellow has not questioned the presence of Musiliu Obanikoro, Chris Uba and others who came to the state or are these people above the laws?,” the party queried.
Meanwhile, politicians who commented on the face-off blamed the DSS for being too hasty and uncompromising in reacting to the actions of opposition parties as opposed to when it relates with members of the ruling party, the Peoples Democratic Party [PDP].
A public commentator and politician, Chief Winston Odumu-Ojobi who spoke first said: “it is unfortunate for the DSS to have made the bribe allegation. The agency should not act in a way that would make the public think it is supporting the ruling party or helping to heat up the political space.
Chief Odumu–Ojobi who is the former Deputy National Chairman [North] of the United Nigeria Peoples Party (UNPP) remarked that: “The bribe allegation should not have happened. It is unwarranted and uncalled for and everyone, including the security agencies should help the Osun election winner [Governor Rauf Aregbesola] and Osun state settle down in peace to governance.
Odumu–Ojobi argued that since “the PDP and Mr. President have congratulated the winner, what any sensible politician or security organisation should do now is to sheath their swords and concentrate on how to defeat the insurgents decimating the northeast part of the country instead of brewing unnecessary controversies.”
National Secretary of the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties [CNPP], Chief Willy Ezeugwu, on his part said: “The CNPP does not have any position on the matter since we do not belong to the APC. Talking personally however, I think the controversy is simply unnecessary although I do not have the full details of the matter and what really took place that the DSS was complaining about.”
Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council [IPAC], Dr. Tanko Yunusa who was the Vice Presidential Candidate of the National Conscience Party (NCP) in the 2011 presidential election advised the DSS not to bring itself to ridicule by openly supporting the ruling party in elections or dragging itself into unnecessary controversies that may sway public opinion against the agency.
He said the opposition political parties and other Nigerians are also entitled to the protection that the DSS offers appealing that the agency should equally provide proper security cover that are governed by the same rules which apply to the government, the PDP and their officers to enable the security agency come out clean always without appearing to be partisan or biased in its actions.

Source

No comments:

Post a Comment