w

Tuesday 20 August 2013

Age falsification and bribery: A tale of two judges

AT the end of one of its periodical meetings on July 17 and 18, the National Judicial Council (NJC) recommended, among other things, that the Chief Judge of Abia State, Justice Shadrack O. E. Nwanosike, should proceed on compulsory retirement over his alleged complicity in age falsification. This piece of news incidentally broke out on the same date (Monday, 29th July, 2013) that it was reported that Justice Joseph Wowo, a Nigerian Judge on secondment to the Gambian Judiciary, was relieved of his position for demanding a bribe of about N12.5 million from a litigant in The Gambia in order to pervert  justice.

 The act of these two judges is a blot on the escutcheon and manifests how deep-rooted corruption has become ingrained in the Nigerian judiciary vis-à-vis the Nigerian society. Falsification of age is one of the most rampant misdemeanours committed in the civil or public service in Nigeria. It has even taken root in our football sector such that we have age-cheats in all competitions where age has become a factor in the choice of participants. Civil servants in ministries swear to affidavits regularly to reduce their ages in order to prolong their stay in their positions and stave off retirements. This act of consistent and persistent lying under oath has made the offence of perjury as ridiculous as the offence of bigamy in Nigeria.

Notwithstanding the rampancy of this infamous conduct of age falsification, one would have thought that a judge, like Caesar’s wife, will be above board in that respect. Perhaps, Justice Shadrack might have forgotten the eminent place of a judge in a society. A judge is firstly a lawyer. Charles Philips, a British academician had described the prime position of the law profession thus:
 “Of all that God empowered man to achieve as an academic discipline and pursuit on this planet earth, none has a heavenlier aspect than the law profession: that at abroad it is an introduction, in the society an ornament, in solace a comforter; without it what is a man”
Besides being a lawyer, Justice Shadrack, as a judge, has the key of santus sanctorium of justice. He has the power of life and death. He is a mirror to the society. His calling is far more beyond that of mere mortals. A judge operates on a code and his life is regulated by a code of conduct as follows:
Rule 1: Avoidance of impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all the activities of a judicial officer.

Rule 2: Administrative and adjudicative duties of a judicial officer.
Rule 3: Guidelines that regulate the extra-judicial activities of a judicial officer in order to minimize the risk of conflict with the duties of his office.
It is evident that Justice Shadrack falsified his age so as to remain in office to exercise more power and make more money to the detriment of the State, litigants, and citizens of Abia State! This is corruption simplicita and it is one of the forms of corruption that section 15 (5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) has enjoined the Nigerian State to eradicate or abolish.

 On the other hand, Justice Joseph Wowo, the Nigerian judge serving in Gambia, seems to have exported our culture of bribery to Gambia by demanding a whopping sum of N12.5 million from a litigant. This act of Justice Joseph is infra dignitatem (below his dignity) to say the least. If only this judge had remembered the lesson in “The Incorruptible Judge”, he might have behaved differently and saved Nigeria this opprobrium. Justice Wowo forgot that he was not only a judge but an “ambassador” of Nigeria in The Gambia, a country with a population of about 1.776 million. Justice Wowo could have taken a cue from the incorruptibility of many Nigerian jurists who have served meritoriously in The Gambia such as the Late Justice Akinola Aguda and Justice Moronkeji Onalaja. If these ones had desecrated the temple of justice in The Gambia, the door opened for the accommodation of more Nigerian jurists in that country’s judiciary would have been closed long ago. The resultant sack of Justice Joseph Wowo is, therefore, a welcome (although a sad) development.
 The reprehensible act of Justices Shadrack and Joseph confirms the Biblical handwriting on the wall: mene mene tekel uphasin (meaning that they have been weighed and found wanting). The conduct of these two judges will increase the pressure on the judiciary to engage in further saponification of the hallowed temple of justice in order to smoke out its black legs. To enthrone sanity, this writer recommends that the Nigerian Judiciary should open a Black Book where names of the likes of Justice Shadrack and Justice Joseph would be written for posterity to note.

 In my humble opinion, I consider the punishment meted out to the two judges as insufficient and non-deterrent. The appropriate authorities should proceed to deny them the use of the word “Justice” against their names; also, the two judges should be charged to court for the various offences they have been alleged to have committed. If convicted, they should be sentenced to terms of imprisonment in accordance with the legal maxim of fiat justitia, ruat coelum (meaning let justice be done though the heavens may fall). The current “punishment” of merely relieving them of their positions is a slap on the wrist and unacceptable. Time has come to end impunity of corrupt judges.

Source: Guardian

No comments:

Post a Comment